Description of automobile tires Gislaved NordFrost 100

Car tires Gislaved NordFrost 100 - advantages, disadvantages, characteristics

Specifications

General characteristics
PurposeAppointment: for the car / for the SUV
SeasonalitySeasonality: winter
DiameterDiameter: 13/14/15/16/17/18/19 "
Profile widthProfile width: 155/165/175/185/195/205/215/225/235/245/265 mm
Profile heightProfile height: 40/45/50/55/60/65/70/75/80
Functions and features
Maximum Speed ​​IndexMaximum speed index: T (up to 190 km / h)
Load indexLoad index: 75 ... 116
Maximum load (per tire)Maximum load (per tire): 387 ... 1250 kg
Sealing methodSealing method: tubeless
DesignConstruction: radial
RunFlat technologyRunFlat technology: no
SpikesThorns: yes

Reviews winter tires Gislaved NordFrost 100

Virtues

  • Price
  • Eminent manufacturer
  • Designed in Sweden
  • Production in Germany
  • New model, therefore, produced in 2013 (the rubber mixture is fresh)
  • It looks very tenacious spike

disadvantages

  • NOT

Comment
Bought a kit at a dumping price of 4060 p. for tire 215/65 / R16 in the online store. With delivery to Murmansk came out 17200 p. per set. Yesterday set, while run in; when it starts to freeze or snow - add a review.
UPDATE: rubber run in 600 km. A lot of snow fell yesterday and today in Murmansk, the temperature ranged from -2 to 3 degrees. On snow and slush rubber tires rows perfectly. Before that, there was Gislaved Nord Frost 5 - he could not row so much. On slightly icy and wet asphalt, tires are beyond praise. We have a relief city - many steep hills, often icy; for this rubber, at the temperatures indicated by me and over the porridge, it comes on a hill without a problem (Auto - Camry 2013 onwards). While very pleased - let's see what will happen when the frost, which will soon promise.
COMPLETE AGAIN: This time, the mileage is already about 1500 km. At a temperature of -7 degrees tires showed themselves even better than at -2. On icy and snowy hills, they behave amazingly, the main thing is not to gas much and the tires will pull out. In the presence of antibuksa and ESP on the road behaves predictably. Let's wait for stronger frosts ...
COMPLETE AGAIN: Run already 3000 km along the snow-covered Murmansk roads and country roads at temperatures down to -15 degrees. There were several strong snowstorms, during which the Gislaved Nord Frost 100 rubber on unpeeled roads finally formed its reputation of excellent rubber. In conjunction with the anti-skid and anti-skid systems of the Toyota Camry, this rubber does an excellent job with its tasks. In this supplement, I emphasize the excellent rowing properties on loose snow in the hill.
Anonim 2013-12-02 Evaluation 5


Virtues

  • Quality spikes.
  • Good holds on any surface.
  • Low noise.
  • Price-quality ratio.

disadvantages

  • apparently they are not. For the season not found.

Comment
Passed on this rubber about 8 thousand km. Acquired in October 2013 for 3150 per cylinder in the amount of 185/60 / R14. Operated in the conditions of Novosibirsk. Rubber showed itself very well, even unexpectedly well. I chose between the leaders among winter tires: Nokian Hakka 7, Gislaved NF 5 and NF 100, Hakka dropped out immediately because of the price, NF5 and NF100 looked much more acceptable, but the NF5 model is already old, and the NF100 is the latest model of 2013, the NF5. The difference between them in the number of spikes, so as according to European standards, their number was reduced due to the impact on asphalt. There are fewer of them on the NF100, but the NF100 is still produced in Germany, and the NF5 in Russia. I will not say that Russian production is worse, but I still wanted German tires)
I would like to note the excellent handling of the car with this rubber, and the average noise level. From the noise I will say one thing - they are spikes, they must make noise! But in moderation, just like this rubber. For comparison, I can say this - it doesn’t make any noise at all compared to Amtel tires, which are studded there! The difference is heaven and earth! Many people write that rubber has a soft sidewall that is afraid of side cuts - this is not true, or rather, any rubber can be cut. In the spring I flew into a huge hole in the asphalt - as a result, two cast disks cannot be restored (bent and eight on them), but the NF100 is not a trace !!! Tire already surprised. In addition, all the spikes for the season remained in place! Keeps road tires at the level that dry asphalt, that snow, that ice. (The main thing here is to drive wisely, before there was no winter tire at all - and nothing) In general, during the winter I have never failed, although my driving style is aggressive.
For the season - signs of wear visible - no!
Smirnov Sergey, 2014-04-13 Evaluation 5


Virtues

  • Patency in the snow, coupling properties on all surfaces, high level of comfort, low noise.

disadvantages

  • It seems like no

Comment
Installed on the Tiguan 215 / 65R16 (4030 rubles apiece) and the Ford Fiesta 175 / 65R14 (2100 apiece). The first 300 kilometers hum strong. After running the noise came back to normal.
From recent observations:
Tiguan - highway -5 -10 degrees. Ice and snow. Rode in a strong snowstorm. Speed ​​90-120 exchange rate stability is excellent. Braking ice with snow is just great. From 120 I had to brake sharply once: (the pots jumped out under me) on the axial snow drift, and under it ice !. I did not expect such a slowdown honestly. Well, I cannot objectively evaluate the patency on the virgin soil, and so all the same all-wheel drive. Touched too well.
Differences in smoothness with summer Bridzhsounom not noticed. 2.3 atm.
Fiesta is a city, sometimes not at all clean in the morning. Speed ​​up to 80. Acceleration and directional stability are excellent. ESP very rarely and gently intervenes and copes. In the yard rowing through the snowdrifts and back and forth. Braking is excellent, rarely comes to the actuation of ABS.
Acoustic comfort is normal. Smooth ride is much better than the regular Michelin PE2, but it is R15! 2.0 atm. The only thing is that the car became more willing to take revenge with the tail in turns with excess speed, but the drift is smooth and easily corrected (in my opinion, the fiesta is a model of controllability in the class - in summer you can not think at what speed you turn into a turn)
On the asphalt, the impressions are similar - it slows down quite well, almost does not require steering in straight-line motion, it brakes reliably while easily metering the slowdown. Twists a little more smeared, but without sharp reactions.
Different cars, different dimensions. Negative emotions do not cause either of the others. Recommend.
Balandin Pavel Viktorovich, 2013-12-17 Evaluation 5


Virtues

  • Adequate price, good landing spike, low noise.

disadvantages

  • What kind of serious shortcomings, which would not have been the competitors did not reveal.

Comment
These tires in dimension 205/60/16 I operate on Opel Astra ST. For the full last season and the beginning of the current tires drove a little more than 30t.km.
In my opinion one of the most adequate offers in terms of price / quality ratio. For the entire mileage is not enough 1 spike on the whole set.
I traveled a lot on different tires. In these I want to highlight a really low noise level. Whoever does not agree with this statement, he simply did not go, for example, to Dunlop SP Winter ICE 01, well, or to Nokian Nordman 4.
The tire showed itself quite well in snowy saline porridge and rolled snow. Ice and deep snow transfers mediocrely. On the ice it slows down weakly, in turn it holds at a certain speed, then gently breaks. In deep snow, quickly buried. Due to the soft sidewall, it copes well with rutting, but at the same time it rolls sufficiently in corners, the car floats slightly at speed. Pits and bumps drives very comfortable.
A good universal winter tire, you feel quite comfortable behind the wheel both on urban slush and on unpolluted country roads. What is excessive to expect from this tire is not worth it, especially if you are a fan of active driving style.
Lowered the grade for workmanship, because there are casting flaws on the seams on the outside, and an evaluation of the convenience of operation for the absence of a baffle in a given dimension to protect the disc against curbs, etc.
Anonim 2014-11-10 Evaluation 4


Virtues

  • Comfortable, predictable, when braking on any surfaces in the top three, price 4500 p.

disadvantages

  • A small rumble after 60 km / h on the frozen asphalt, I think will disappear after running (Toyota Avensis)

Comment
Eight seasons (~ 70000-80000 km) departure for Gislaved Nord Frost 3 (unkillable tires, the spikes of course all worn out, 20 percent flew out, but the tread is almost intact). Comparing with the Gislaved Nord Frost 100, I can say that new tires work out irregularities and joints a little better (the sidewall is a bit softer). Weaving is the same comfortable as the NF3, the car does not walk, goes straight. Brakes, of course, on the new studded tires and on the old tires is incorrect to compare (it is clear that heaven and earth). It is very noticeable that, by all indications, rubber has not exactly become worse, either on a par or better, only time will tell about reliability and durability. New tires satisfied. I recommend to buy.
Andreyev Andrey, 2013-11-05 Evaluation 5


Virtues

  • Very reliable tires

disadvantages

  • Dorogovata, a small not straining hum

Comment
Comments: Honda CP-B car, 2014 / in, four-wheel drive, size 225/60 / R18 XL, took in September for 8300 rubles, made in Germany. Operation - Moscow, Moscow region, 50:50 highway city. There were four criteria - spikes, quiet, reliable on any surfaces (universal) and only well-known manufacturers. Personal operating experience since 2002 Gislaved NF3 and NF5.
About noise. On the Internet, many users confuse the noise from the spikes (clatter) and the hum from the tread. The clatter from the spikes will always be and it is almost not audible in the cabin, only with the window open and at low speed. But the rumble of the tread can ruin everything, even wear a tank helmet. From 80% to 90% of reviews sin with just that. Only disorienting.
Now about the rubber itself. Mileage 5000 km. The weather was also a minus without snow and plus, dry asphalt and wet, snow, nakata, porridge. Holds and brakes perfectly. Permutation through the snowy nakata and porridge 100-110 km / h on the Moscow Ring Road without any problems. Dry and wet asphalt - 140km / h, no longer accelerated. Over 100 km / h there is a small yaw, especially in the left lane on the track, but quite rarely, apparently dependent on the road surface. I tried on the dirt. The hill is about 30 degrees, the frozen crust, and under it a soft mass. I drove off the hill without slipping. In another place on the snow covered with icy snow from a place from the middle of the hill it is easy, also without slipping. Perhaps because of all-wheel drive. From 50 km / h begins vibrating hum. The maximum volume at 80 km / h - over it becomes quieter, but does not disappear. On the Market there is a review, a colleague called this rumble “helicopter”, as if the helicopter was flying from behind, but somewhere far away. Absolutely accurate feature. The buzz is not annoying and not annoying, rather quiet and peculiar, you do not notice it after a week.
Balanced from 30 to 100 grams. on the wheel. It was necessary to twist on the disk, but I forgot about it during installation. Then he did not want to mess around and spend money.
Given the fact that winter tires with a directional tread buzzing all - this is the most comfortable.
antipova nata, 2014-12-29 Evaluation 5

Watch the video: Winter Tire Review: Gislaved Tires NordFrost 100 one of the best winter tire (November 2019).

Loading...